|
January 2008
Apples for Apples – I’m sure you’ve heard this term used many times.
It’s the old-school measurement of how similar things compare to one
another. Hold items up side-by-side and see how they compare. The
ultimate purpose of the exercise is to evaluate a particular item,
situation or need. Then you can use that evaluation - apply that
knowledge - to accomplish your related goal. Apple for apple
comparisons occur all the time, formally and informally. Formal
comparisons often fall into the category of studies or assessments.
In
2006, the average home built in
America
was 2,459 square feet - up from less than 2,000 square feet in the
1980s. That’s one type of apple. Traditional Convenience Stores
operate in about 2,500 square feet, Mini Convenience Stores offer
about 800 to 1,200 square feet, and Kiosk’s offer less than 800
square feet. These are other kinds of apples. Of course the apples
we like to compare are Public Access facilities.
In
the early days PAC 14 occupied about 500 square feet of office
space, from which we provided access services to an entire
population of county residents; some 75,000 or so. Nine years later
we operate within about 1,000 square feet and the population is
headed toward 100,000 before long. While any increase is good, our
current footprint falls short of significantly addressing the need.
Like any for-profit business or non-profit organization the concept
is to improve your service, entice new consumers (users) and grow.
In
comparing apples for apples in Access terms, we look at other
regional access media centers, a good example of which is
Montgomery
County and Carroll County Maryland. Pound for pound Carroll's apple
weighs nine times ours, coming in at roughly 9,000 square feet.
Given the data provided above our community media service operates
in the same footprint as a kiosk. In funding comparisons, well,
let’s say the two aren’t in the same orchard.
Location is anther key component, in the real estate biz they refer
to location-location-location. While PAC 14 was recognized in 2006
as the top access station in the country for its size – which
assumes our visible product (on air) exceeds expectations – our
physical location within the community isn’t visible. While I could
argue PAC 14 provides as much value to the TV viewer as other local
stations, I’d bet most local folks could point out their
headquarters on a map and not ours. Sadly ironic, because PAC 14 is
a publically accessible service which actively invites public
participation and video production.
Another apple for apple comparison would be – per channel funding –
the price that all cable subscribers pay for the channels they
receive. The FCC has considered ala carte options, that is paying
for only the channels you want; however the likelihood of that
happening is slim to none. According to some accounts operators
would price channels at $4 to $5 each, an as a result most consumers
would receive fewer channels and/or a higher monthly cable bill.
Ala
carte aside, each subscriber currently pays for the channels they
receive. Most of the networks charge cable for their service and the
subscriber in turn pays for that service (channel) within their
monthly bill.
In
the case of a national public service like C-SPAN, they receive .5
cents per subscriber – per month. At roughly 70 or 80 million
subscribers it’s easy to see how they fund the facilities and
services needed to provide programming on a national scale. Needless
to say the major news and entertainment networks come at a much
higher cost per subscriber. Here in our community, PAC 14 receives
no subscriber based per subscriber - per month funds - which would
provide the capital support to build and equip our community media
facility; our greatest need to date.
Nationally, Access operations receive approximately 75 cents to $1
per subscriber per month to support their service. While that
appears much higher than the 5 cents C-SPAN receives, you have to
factor in smaller communities and ‘significantly’ fewer subscribers.
Unlike many channels on the line-up, stations like PAC 14 are
uniquely local and provide a tremendous amount of value to the
subscriber and the community. We serve both the volunteer producer
and the viewer - you must have both; regardless of either's status
as a cable subscriber. Citizen volunteers help provide programming,
citizens in turn may watch the programming. The – per month – per
subscriber fee is a commonly used method to fund PEG Access
operations capital need.
So,
apples for apples, there would seem to be a significant difference
between our community media service and others; in facility size and
funding. This information is offered for informational purposes
only. The most common questioned asked of us is, how are you funded?
The information provided should help you understand a bit better and
appreciate both sides of the story. When you watch at home it’s
difficult to appreciate the challenges behind the scenes, you just
appreciate the local programming. PAC 14’s history is filled with a
great success and achievements, yet a few simple but vital elements
hinder our ability to grow. Without the same apples for apples
support and funding that others receive, meeting current and future
need would be extremely difficult; if not impossible.
A
great deal of the information I mentioned is available on the web,
just type in the key words and you’ll find the information. The web
is a wonderful thing – then again – so is PAC 14.
Happy New Year! Thanks to all for your support of PAC 14.
Mike Goodson,
Manager PAC 14
READ ARCHIVED NEWSLETTERS
Short cut
to membership - If I've sold you please help us -
click here.
|